Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

OIG LEIE (Federal Exclusion List) vs CMS PECOS: Side-by-Side Comparison

OIG LEIE and CMS PECOS are federal HHS/CMS systems that answer different questions: PECOS reports Medicare enrollment, while LEIE reports federal program exclusions. Checking both covers those two federal records; it does not establish complete credentialing, licensure, or state-exclusion coverage.

Dimension by dimension

OIG LEIE (Federal Exclusion List) vs CMS PECOS, across 8 dimensions

DimensionOIG LEIE (Federal Exclusion List)CMS PECOS
Data typeFederal exclusion records — OIG-sanctioned providers barred from Medicare/Medicaid billingMedicare fee-for-service enrollment — active billing authorization by specialty and state
Coverage83,464 excluded individuals and entities (monthly snapshot)~900,000 active Medicare FFS enrollment records
Refresh cadenceOIG publishes monthly; Fonteum's newest loaded LEIE source date was 2026-06-30 when checked 2026-08-12CMS publishes periodically; Fonteum's newest loaded source-release date was 2026-06-18 when checked 2026-07-12
License / CostU.S. government public-domain works — free to redistribute with attributionU.S. government public-domain works — free to use and redistribute with attribution
API accessMonthly CSV at oig.hhs.gov; no REST API from OIG directlyCSV bulk download via data.cms.gov; no dedicated REST API
Source provenanceOIG source and loaded date are identified; file-digest and attestation coverage is snapshot-specificAvailable source and observation metadata varies by response; no provenance fact currently links deterministically to a signature
Primary use caseSanction screening — identifying excluded providers before contracting with or billing federal programs for themMedicare enrollment confirmation — confirming a provider is actively enrolled and authorized to bill FFS
PricingFree (federal public domain)Free (federal public domain)

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use OIG LEIE (Federal Exclusion List)

Use OIG LEIE for sanction screening — checking whether a provider is excluded from federal healthcare-program participation. OIG advises checking before employing or contracting and periodically afterward; its guidance says monthly screening best minimizes potential liability because OIG publishes a refreshed LEIE file each month.

OIG LEIE (Federal Exclusion List) source detail →

When to use CMS PECOS

Use CMS PECOS for Medicare enrollment confirmation — confirming whether a provider is actively enrolled and authorized to receive Medicare reimbursement for a given specialty and state.

CMS PECOS source detail →

FAQ

Common questions

Should I check OIG LEIE and PECOS for the same provider?
They answer different questions. PECOS reports Medicare enrollment; LEIE reports exclusion from federal healthcare programs. A program that needs both enrollment and exclusion status should check both records rather than treating either one as a substitute for the other.
Can a provider be in PECOS and on the OIG LEIE simultaneously?
CMS and OIG coordinate to terminate Medicare participation when a provider is excluded, but the two records answer different questions and may not update at the same time. OIG advises periodic LEIE checks and says monthly screening best minimizes potential liability because OIG publishes a refreshed LEIE file each month.
What is the difference between exclusion and debarment?
OIG LEIE covers exclusion from federal healthcare programs (Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, TRICARE). SAM.gov covers debarment from federal contracting. These are different sanctions from different agencies. A full compliance screen for a healthcare contractor typically covers both.
How does Fonteum combine OIG LEIE and PECOS?
Fonteum can cross-resolve PECOS and the NPI-bearing subset of OIG LEIE where both rows supply the same NPI. Most LEIE rows do not carry one, so name-based screening remains a separate process with its own limitations. Returned fields retain source attribution and dates.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access