Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

Komodo Health vs Trella Health: Side-by-Side Comparison

Komodo Health and Trella Health both use claims data but at different scope. Komodo Health covers the broad healthcare market with a 325M-patient claims graph. Trella Health focuses specifically on the post-acute care market — home health, hospice, SNFs — providing claims analytics to the organizations and vendors in that segment.

Dimension by dimension

Komodo Health vs Trella Health, across 8 dimensions

DimensionKomodo HealthTrella Health
Data typeBroad healthcare claims graph — 325M+ patients across all care settingsPost-acute claims analytics — home health, hospice, SNF, IRF referral patterns
Coverage325M+ patients (publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
Refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostEnterprise license; pricing by quoteEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessEnterprise API; not public— (not publicly disclosed)
Source provenanceProprietary claims linkage; methodology not publicly documentedClaims-based; methodology not publicly documented
Primary use caseBroad RWE, payer analytics, specialty market sizing across all care settingsPost-acute referral analytics, SNF/HH/hospice market intelligence, sales territory planning in post-acute
PricingBy quote; pricing not publicBy quote; pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Komodo Health

Use Komodo Health when the scope spans all care settings — acute, ambulatory, behavioral, post-acute — and the work requires a unified patient journey across the full continuum.

https://www.komodohealth.com

When to use Trella Health

Use Trella Health when the focus is specifically post-acute — understanding SNF referral patterns, home health agency market share, or hospice census trends for a regional sales or strategy team.

https://www.trellahealth.com

FAQ

Common questions

Is Trella Health part of Komodo Health?
No. As of this writing, Trella Health and Komodo Health are separate companies. Trella Health operates as an independent post-acute analytics platform.
Which platform is better for post-acute care analytics?
Trella Health is purpose-built for post-acute analytics — SNF, home health, hospice referral tracking is its core product. Komodo Health covers post-acute as part of its broader claims graph but is not optimized for that segment specifically.
What federal data covers the post-acute space?
CMS Care Compare publishes facility-quality data for nursing homes, home health agencies, and hospices — all free and publicly downloadable quarterly. CMS PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) provides daily staffing data for SNFs. These are the federal primary sources underlying commercial post-acute analytics.
Can post-acute claims data be reproduced without a vendor?
Not directly — claims data requires payer partnerships and is proprietary. However, CMS publishes provider-level utilization aggregates through the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data program, and facility-level quality data through Care Compare. These are free, reproducible starting points for post-acute research.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access