Healthgrades vs Vitals: Side-by-Side Comparison
Healthgrades and Vitals are both consumer-facing doctor-rating platforms built on patient reviews and self-reported provider profiles. They serve overlapping audiences — patients deciding between doctors — but differ in scale, editorial approach, and how prominently they surface clinical data versus review aggregations.
Healthgrades vs Vitals, across 8 dimensions
| Dimension | Healthgrades | Vitals |
|---|---|---|
| Data type | Patient reviews + self-reported profiles + insurance data | Patient reviews + self-reported profiles |
| Coverage | ~3 million+ provider profiles | ~1 million+ provider profiles |
| Refresh cadence | — (not publicly disclosed) | — (not publicly disclosed) |
| License / Cost | Free to consumers; B2B and advertising model for providers | Free to consumers; B2B and advertising model for providers |
| API access | No public API | No public API |
| Source provenance | Patient-submitted reviews; licensing status sourced from state boards — field-level provenance not publicly documented | Patient-submitted reviews; field-level provenance is not publicly documented |
| Primary use case | Patient discovery and doctor selection based on reviews and proximity | Patient discovery and doctor selection based on reviews |
| Pricing | Free for patients; provider marketing packages — pricing not public | Free for patients; provider plans — pricing not public |
Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.
Which platform fits your team
When to use Healthgrades
Healthgrades is the larger platform and indexes more insurance networks, board certifications, and malpractice records alongside patient reviews. Choose Healthgrades when breadth of provider coverage and insurance compatibility filters are the priority.
When to use Vitals
Vitals is a smaller, review-first platform. Choose Vitals for focused patient-sentiment research on a specific provider when review depth matters more than breadth.
Common questions
- Which platform has more provider listings — Healthgrades or Vitals?
- Healthgrades publicly reports coverage exceeding 3 million provider profiles; Vitals is smaller. For sheer breadth of listings and insurance-network filters, Healthgrades leads.
- Do Healthgrades or Vitals expose an API for programmatic access?
- Neither platform publishes a public REST API. CMS NPPES, PECOS, and OIG LEIE publish primary-source data for NPI records, Medicare enrollment, and exclusions. Those datasets can be joined by NPI only where each source row supplies it; most LEIE rows do not.
- Are the reviews on Healthgrades and Vitals independently attested?
- Both platforms collect patient-submitted reviews. Neither publishes a formal attestation methodology or a field-level provenance chain tracing each review to an auditable source. Review sentiment should be treated as self-reported consumer data, not clinically validated quality.
- What source backs physician ratings on these platforms?
- Ratings on both platforms are aggregated from patient surveys and self-reported provider submissions. The upstream source is consumer-submitted, not a federal primary record. For provenance-grade clinical and enrollment data, CMS NPPES, PECOS, and CMS Care Compare are the primary federal sources.
Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →
Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.
Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.