Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

Definitive Healthcare vs Komodo Health: Side-by-Side Comparison

Definitive Healthcare and Komodo Health are both enterprise healthcare data platforms, but with different core assets. Definitive Healthcare leads with facility intelligence, technology-install data, and executive contacts. Komodo Health leads with a longitudinal patient claims graph across 325 million patients. The two often appear on the same enterprise shortlists.

Dimension by dimension

Definitive Healthcare vs Komodo Health, across 8 dimensions

DimensionDefinitive HealthcareKomodo Health
Data typeFacility intelligence, technology installs, executive contacts, claims-enriched provider profilesLongitudinal patient claims graph — 325M+ patients (publicly disclosed); real-world evidence analytics
Coverage— (not publicly disclosed)325 million patients (publicly disclosed by Komodo)
Refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostEnterprise license; pricing by quoteEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessEnterprise API for customers; not a public open APIEnterprise API for customers; not a public open API
Source provenanceProprietary aggregation; field-level source lineage not publicly documentedClaims-based; patient-level linkage methodology proprietary
Primary use caseCommercial go-to-market: sales territory planning, facility targeting, exec contact dataReal-world evidence, payer analytics, specialty market sizing, longitudinal patient journeys
PricingBy quote; third-party reports cite five- to six-figure annual licensesBy quote; pricing not publicly posted

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Definitive Healthcare

Use Definitive Healthcare when the work is commercial go-to-market for healthcare organizations — territory planning, facility-technology install targeting, or executive outreach. Its facility and technology-layer data is the reference for commercial teams.

https://www.definitivehc.com

When to use Komodo Health

Use Komodo Health when the work requires longitudinal patient-journey analysis, real-world evidence generation, or payer-facing analytics. Its claims graph at 325M patient scale is its differentiator.

https://www.komodohealth.com

FAQ

Common questions

Do Definitive Healthcare and Komodo Health compete directly?
They overlap in healthcare enterprise data but serve different primary buyers. Definitive Healthcare targets commercial and go-to-market teams; Komodo Health targets real-world evidence, payer analytics, and clinical research teams. Many enterprises use both.
Which platform has better provider-level data?
Both platforms include provider data, but from different angles. Definitive Healthcare builds provider profiles from claims and commercial sources with a go-to-market frame; Komodo Health builds patient-encounter graphs that also surface provider activity. For primary-source federal provider records — NPI, enrollment, exclusion status — CMS NPPES, PECOS, and OIG LEIE are the authoritative inputs, and both platforms ingest from them.
Are coverage and pricing for these platforms publicly documented?
Neither Definitive Healthcare nor Komodo Health publicly posts their pricing. Coverage metrics are disclosed selectively in press materials — Komodo Health's 325M patient figure is publicly cited; Definitive Healthcare's comparable patient or provider counts are not publicly detailed. Cells marked '—' reflect this.
What is the difference between claims data and federal provider data?
Claims data (the basis of both Komodo Health and much of Definitive Healthcare) is derived from insurance billing records — it captures encounters but is proprietary and cannot be independently recreated. Federal provider data (NPPES, PECOS, OIG LEIE, Care Compare) is published directly by CMS and other agencies, carries explicit redistribution rights, and can be independently reproduced and cited.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access