Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

Definitive Healthcare vs HealthVerity: Side-by-Side Comparison

Definitive Healthcare is a provider-market intelligence platform; HealthVerity is an identity and claims data marketplace. Both are enterprise-only. The comparison is relevant for teams deciding between provider-market intelligence and patient/claims-linked data assets.

Dimension by dimension

Definitive Healthcare vs HealthVerity, across 8 dimensions

DimensionDefinitive HealthcareHealthVerity
Data typeFacility intelligence, provider profiles, claims-enriched data, technology installsPatient identity graph + claims, Rx, and consumer data marketplace
Coverage— (not publicly disclosed)320M+ patient identity records (per HealthVerity marketing)
Refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostEnterprise license; pricing by quoteEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessEnterprise API; not publicEnterprise data-delivery pipelines; not a public open API
Source provenanceProprietary aggregation; field-level lineage not publicly documentedIdentity linkage and claims data; proprietary methodology, not independently auditable
Primary use caseHealthcare commercial go-to-market, facility targeting, exec contactsReal-world evidence, patient journey analytics, privacy-compliant data licensing
PricingBy quote; five- to six-figure annual licenses per external reportsBy quote; pricing not publicly posted

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Definitive Healthcare

Use Definitive Healthcare for provider-market intelligence — facility targeting, technology-install data, and commercial sales territory planning. It is optimized for the B2B healthcare sales motion.

https://www.definitivehc.com

When to use HealthVerity

Use HealthVerity when the work requires patient-level longitudinal analysis with privacy-compliant data linkage — real-world evidence studies, Rx analytics, or building patient cohorts across claims and consumer data.

https://healthverity.com

FAQ

Common questions

Are Definitive Healthcare and HealthVerity the same type of platform?
No. Definitive Healthcare is a provider-market intelligence tool oriented toward commercial go-to-market. HealthVerity is a patient identity and claims data marketplace oriented toward real-world evidence and privacy-compliant patient analytics. Their overlap is in the healthcare data infrastructure category, not in use case.
Do either platform offer open data or free tiers?
Neither offers open data or a public free tier. Both are enterprise-only, sales-gated products. For open healthcare provider data, federal sources — CMS NPPES, PECOS, OIG LEIE, and CMS Care Compare — are publicly available with no access restrictions.
Which platform is better for compliance use cases?
HealthVerity is specifically designed for privacy-compliant patient data use cases (HIPAA, state privacy laws). Definitive Healthcare's compliance use cases center on commercial data accuracy. For provider exclusion and sanction compliance specifically, OIG LEIE — the federal exclusion list — is the primary source, available free monthly from oig.hhs.gov.
Can Definitive Healthcare or HealthVerity data be independently reproduced?
No. Both platforms are built on proprietary data assets whose collection methodology and source composition are not publicly documented. Claims from either platform cannot be independently reproduced by a third party. Federal primary sources (NPPES, Care Compare, Open Payments) can be independently reproduced because the inputs are public and the methodology can be stated explicitly.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access