Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Open Payments vs Definitive Healthcare: Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Open Payments (the Sunshine Act database) is the federal disclosure of payments from pharmaceutical manufacturers and device companies to physicians and teaching hospitals — free, annual, and publicly searchable. Definitive Healthcare is an enterprise commercial platform that layers go-to-market intelligence on top of federal foundations including Open Payments. They serve different purposes: one is a disclosure requirement, the other is a commercial intelligence product.

Dimension by dimension

CMS Open Payments vs Definitive Healthcare, across 8 dimensions

DimensionCMS Open PaymentsDefinitive Healthcare
Data typeFederal physician payment disclosures — industry payments to doctors and teaching hospitalsFacility intelligence, provider profiles, technology installs, exec contacts, claims enrichment — includes Open Payments as one input
Coverage~15 million payment records annually from ~2,500 reporting manufacturers and GPOs— (not publicly disclosed)
Refresh cadenceAnnual CMS publisher cadence (calendar-year lag); check the separately dated Fonteum load— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostU.S. government public-domain works — free to redistribute with attributionEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessopenpaymentsdata.cms.gov bulk CSV and API; no key requiredEnterprise API; not public
Source provenanceNPI-keyed rows with publication year; SHA-256 snapshot digest on each runProprietary aggregation; field-level source lineage not publicly documented
Primary use caseFinancial relationship disclosure, conflict-of-interest research, compliance review, journalismHealthcare commercial go-to-market, facility targeting, exec outreach, sales territory planning
PricingFree (federal public domain)By quote; five- to six-figure annual licenses per external reports

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use CMS Open Payments

Use CMS Open Payments when the goal is financial relationship disclosure — looking up what a physician received from a pharma or device company, building a conflict-of-interest review, or researching Sunshine Act compliance. The data is free, federal, and annually published.

CMS Open Payments source detail →

When to use Definitive Healthcare

Use Definitive Healthcare when the goal is commercial go-to-market intelligence — territory planning, facility targeting, and executive outreach. Open Payments may appear as one input in Definitive's provider profiles, but the commercial value is in the intelligence layers above it.

https://www.definitivehc.com

FAQ

Common questions

Is CMS Open Payments the same as the Sunshine Act?
Yes. CMS Open Payments is the database mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (Section 6002 of the ACA). Manufacturers and GPOs with products covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP must report all payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals annually.
Does Definitive Healthcare include Open Payments data?
Definitive Healthcare is likely to incorporate CMS Open Payments as one of its inputs, but its specific data sourcing and field-level methodology are proprietary and not publicly documented. The Open Payments data itself is freely available at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
Can Open Payments data be used to identify conflicts of interest in research?
Open Payments is widely used in academic research to study financial relationships between industry and physicians. Because the data is publicly available, annually updated, and NPI-keyed, it can be independently downloaded and analyzed. Researchers should note the annual publication lag — CY data is typically published roughly 5 months after calendar year-end.
What fields are in CMS Open Payments?
Key fields include the physician's NPI and name, the reporting entity, payment amount, payment nature (consulting fee, travel, food, research grant, etc.), and the associated drug or device. Fonteum ingests Open Payments annually and cross-resolves payment records against NPPES for provider identity joins.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access