Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Care Compare vs Komodo Health: Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Care Compare is the federally published quality-ratings system for Medicare-certified facilities — free, publicly reproducible, inspection-based. Komodo Health is an enterprise claims analytics platform with a 325M-patient longitudinal graph. They serve adjacent but very different use cases in healthcare data.

Dimension by dimension

CMS Care Compare vs Komodo Health, across 8 dimensions

DimensionCMS Care CompareKomodo Health
Data typeFederal facility quality ratings — star ratings from inspections, staffing, and outcome measuresLongitudinal patient claims graph — 325M+ patients; real-world evidence analytics
Coverage~50,000+ Medicare-certified facilities325M+ patients (publicly disclosed)
Refresh cadenceCMS publishes on source-specific schedules; checked Care Compare serving tables showed a 2026-05-07 source date on 2026-07-12— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostU.S. government public-domain works — free to redistribute with attributionEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessdata.cms.gov API and bulk CSV downloads; no key requiredEnterprise API; not public
Source provenanceCCN-keyed rows with an available snapshot date; ingestion-row signature linkage is not assertedProprietary claims linkage; methodology not publicly documented
Primary use caseFacility quality benchmarking, inspection history, staffing and outcome comparisonReal-world evidence, specialty market sizing, patient-journey analytics, payer analytics
PricingFree (federal public domain)By quote; pricing not publicly posted

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use CMS Care Compare

Use CMS Care Compare when the goal is facility quality data — star ratings, inspection history, staffing levels, and CMS-computed outcome scores on Medicare-certified nursing homes, home health agencies, hospices, dialysis facilities, and ASCs.

CMS Care Compare source detail →

When to use Komodo Health

Use Komodo Health when the goal is patient-level longitudinal analysis — understanding referral patterns, therapy journeys, or market sizing at the patient-encounter level across payers and care settings.

https://www.komodohealth.com

FAQ

Common questions

Can CMS Care Compare replace Komodo Health for analytics?
They solve different problems. CMS Care Compare is facility-level quality data — inspection results, CMS star ratings, staffing. Komodo Health is patient-level claims analytics — individual encounters across payers and settings. Care Compare cannot replace Komodo's patient journey analytics, and Komodo's claims graph does not replace CMS's inspection-based quality ratings.
Is CMS Care Compare included in Komodo Health?
Commercial platforms like Komodo Health may incorporate CMS public data including Care Compare as inputs, but the specific sourcing methodology is not publicly documented. CMS Care Compare data is freely available directly from data.cms.gov.
What is the quality signal on CMS Care Compare based on?
Quality signals vary by care setting. Nursing home star ratings weight health inspection results most heavily (federal inspectors visit each facility at least annually), plus staffing levels and CMS quality measures. Home health agencies are rated on OASIS-derived process and outcome measures. CMS publishes the full methodology for each rating type.
How do I get CMS Care Compare data for research?
CMS Care Compare data is available as bulk CSV downloads at data.cms.gov and through a public API. Fonteum preserves the source's own identifiers: most facility modules use CCN, while an NPI join is available only on files that publish NPI.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access