Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Care Compare vs Healthgrades: Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Care Compare is the federal government's official quality-ratings tool for Medicare-certified healthcare facilities — nursing homes, home health agencies, hospitals, and more. Healthgrades is a consumer doctor-and-facility rating platform built on patient reviews. The two reach different data about quality from entirely different methodological origins.

Dimension by dimension

CMS Care Compare vs Healthgrades, across 8 dimensions

DimensionCMS Care CompareHealthgrades
Data typeCMS-published facility quality ratings — star ratings from inspections, staffing data, and outcome measuresPatient reviews and ratings + provider/facility self-submitted profiles
Coverage~50,000+ Medicare-certified facilities across all Care Compare modules~3 million+ provider profiles; some facility listings
Refresh cadenceCMS publishes on source-specific schedules; checked Care Compare serving tables showed a 2026-05-07 source date on 2026-07-12— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostU.S. government public-domain works — free to redistribute with attributionFree for consumers; B2B advertising model
API accessdata.cms.gov API and bulk CSV downloads; no key requiredNo public API
Source provenanceCCN-keyed rows with an available snapshot date; ingestion-row signature linkage is not assertedPatient-submitted reviews; state licensing data; field-level provenance not publicly documented
Primary use caseFacility quality benchmarking, inspection history, staffing and outcome comparison across Medicare-certified settingsPatient discovery, doctor reviews, consumer comparison of providers
PricingFree (federal public domain)Free for patients; provider packages — pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use CMS Care Compare

Use CMS Care Compare when the work requires federally sourced, methodology-published facility quality data — nursing home star ratings, home health agency outcomes, inspection histories, and staffing levels. It is the primary source for any defensible quality benchmark on Medicare-certified facilities.

CMS Care Compare source detail →

When to use Healthgrades

Use Healthgrades when the audience is patients comparing physicians and the signal of interest is peer review sentiment and insurance network compatibility — not inspection histories or CMS-computed quality scores.

https://www.healthgrades.com

FAQ

Common questions

Which is more reliable for nursing home quality — CMS Care Compare or Healthgrades?
CMS Care Compare is the authoritative federal source for nursing home quality data. Ratings are computed from standardized inspection reports, staffing levels, and CMS-defined outcome measures collected by trained inspectors and cross-checked annually. Healthgrades nursing home listings primarily rely on consumer reviews, which are self-selected and not standardized by regulatory inspection.
Is CMS Care Compare data free to use?
Yes. CMS Care Compare data is published by the federal government as a public-domain work (17 U.S.C. § 105). Bulk downloads are available at data.cms.gov with no registration or fee. Most facility modules join on CCN; an NPI join is used only where a source, such as the ASC file, supplies it.
Do Healthgrades hospital ratings use CMS data?
Healthgrades incorporates some federal data (including CMS hospital quality measures) into its hospital ratings, but its overall scoring methodology is proprietary. CMS Care Compare's hospital quality data is published separately at medicare.gov/care-compare with full methodology disclosure.
What are the star ratings on CMS Care Compare based on?
Star ratings vary by care setting. Nursing home ratings use three components: health inspections (weighted most heavily), staffing levels, and quality measures. Home health ratings use quality-of-patient-care measures derived from OASIS assessments. CMS publishes the full methodology for each rating type alongside the data at data.cms.gov.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access