Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

Castle Connolly vs Healthgrades: Side-by-Side Comparison

Castle Connolly is a curated physician recognition program that nominates and selects "Top Doctors" based on peer nominations and a credentialing review process. Healthgrades is a consumer-facing platform with ~3M+ provider profiles and patient-submitted reviews. They represent two different philosophies for physician quality signaling: expert curation vs. patient volume.

Dimension by dimension

Castle Connolly vs Healthgrades, across 8 dimensions

DimensionCastle ConnollyHealthgrades
Data typePeer-nominated physician recognition — "Top Doctors" selected by credentialing review and peer surveyConsumer patient reviews + provider-submitted profiles + state licensing data
Coverage~10,000 Top Doctors annually (per Castle Connolly); highly selective~3 million+ provider profiles
Refresh cadenceAnnual nomination and review cycle— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostFree for consumers to search; printed directory and licensing — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider marketing packages — pricing not public
API accessNo public APINo public API
Source provenancePeer nomination + credentialing staff review; selection criteria published at a high level but not field-level auditablePatient-submitted reviews + state licensing; field-level provenance not documented
Primary use casePremium physician discovery for patients seeking peer-recognized specialists; press and consumer recognition for physiciansBroad physician discovery, review reading, insurance-network filtering
PricingFree consumer search; directory and media licensing — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider packages — pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Castle Connolly

Use Castle Connolly when the audience needs a curated shortlist of peer-recognized specialists — particularly for complex or elective procedures where patients are willing to travel for a recognized expert. The list is selective and signals peer regard rather than patient volume.

https://www.castleconnolly.com

When to use Healthgrades

Use Healthgrades for broad provider discovery across any specialty, geography, and insurance network. Its review volume and insurance filters make it the practical starting point for most patient searches, even if it lacks peer-nominated selectivity.

https://www.healthgrades.com

FAQ

Common questions

Is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor designation officially recognized?
Castle Connolly is a private company — its Top Doctor designation is a recognition program, not a regulatory credential. It is peer-influenced and carries brand recognition in physician circles, but it is not issued by a medical board, CMS, or any government agency. For regulated credentials, state medical board licensure and ABMS board certification are the authoritative sources.
How does Castle Connolly select Top Doctors?
Castle Connolly uses a peer nomination process — physicians nominate colleagues — followed by a credentialing review by Castle Connolly's staff. The selection criteria are published at a high level on their website, but the per-nomination decision process is not publicly auditable.
Can Castle Connolly or Healthgrades data be used in a credentialing application?
Neither is a credentialing source for regulatory or billing purposes. For credentialing, the authoritative sources are state medical board licensure (varies by state) and Medicare enrollment status via CMS PECOS. OIG LEIE provides the federal exclusion check. These are the federal primary sources for any compliance-grade credentialing workflow.
Does being on Healthgrades guarantee a physician is in good standing?
No. Healthgrades is a listing and review platform, not a licensure authority. A provider can appear on Healthgrades while under disciplinary action or with a lapsed license. State medical boards and CMS PECOS enrollment status are the authoritative sources for good-standing determination.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access