Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Side-by-Side Comparison

Doximity vs Healthgrades: Side-by-Side Comparison

Doximity is a professional network for physicians, with ~80% of U.S. doctors on the platform. Healthgrades is a consumer-facing rating site. They serve different audiences: Doximity connects clinicians to each other; Healthgrades connects patients to clinicians.

Dimension by dimension

Doximity vs Healthgrades, across 8 dimensions

DimensionDoximityHealthgrades
Data typePhysician professional network — peer connections, CME, secure messaging, e-prescribingPatient-facing provider profiles — reviews, ratings, insurance networks
Coverage~80% of U.S. physicians (publicly disclosed); 2M+ clinicians including NPs and PAs~3 million+ provider profiles
Refresh cadenceSelf-maintained by clinicians; no public refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostFree for physicians; pharmaceutical and B2B advertising — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider marketing — pricing not public
API accessLimited partner API for EHR and telemedicine integrations; not a public open APINo public API
Source provenanceSelf-attested credentials; NPI cross-reference for identity; no field-level provenance chainPatient reviews + state licensing data; field-level provenance not publicly documented
Primary use casePhysician-to-physician communication, referrals, CME, pharma outreachPatient discovery, doctor research, review reading
PricingFree for clinicians; pharma and industry — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider packages — pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Doximity

Use Doximity when the audience is clinicians — for peer referrals, professional directory lookups, or pharma/medtech outreach targeting specific specialties. Doximity's value is clinician-network depth and its NPI cross-reference for identity, not patient-facing transparency.

https://www.doximity.com

When to use Healthgrades

Use Healthgrades when the audience is patients comparing providers. Its review aggregation and insurance-network filters are optimized for the patient decision, not the clinical one.

https://www.healthgrades.com

FAQ

Common questions

Is Doximity a public directory of doctors?
Doximity is primarily a professional network for clinicians, not a public provider directory. Profiles are maintained by clinicians themselves. CMS NPPES is the public federal record for individuals and organizations that have enumerated an NPI; it does not cover every licensed provider or establish licensure.
Can I access Doximity provider data programmatically?
Doximity does not publish a public open API for provider data. Partners can access scheduling and EHR integrations through closed agreements. For open programmatic access, CMS NPPES provides a REST API at npiregistry.cms.hhs.gov/api.
Which platform has more accurate provider information — Doximity or Healthgrades?
Accuracy depends on the field and source date. An NPI cross-reference identifies an NPPES record but does not establish that a credential or license is current. Current licensure must come from the relevant state authority; NPPES and PECOS answer NPI-administration and Medicare-enrollment questions respectively.
How are Doximity and Healthgrades used in healthcare research?
Doximity is occasionally cited for physician demographic studies because of its broad clinician coverage. Healthgrades data is used in patient-experience research. For reproducible academic research, federal primary sources (NPPES, CMS Care Compare, CMS Open Payments) are preferred because the inputs are public, the methodology can be stated explicitly, and the outputs are independently recreatable.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Connect the hosted MCP server to your agent, or call the API with an issued bearer credential. See the developer docs for the current public contract.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access